Pre-solidified can be translated in human language as something that comes before cognition even appears as something tangible or even measurable in the brain. It has nothing to do with thoughts, emotions, or feelings. Many would call that state as awareness before even something emerge. So how can we know about it?

Seeing from the outside, from the third person perspective is simple. We plug in a machgine and it translates to us what has been perceived on its screen. But it AI?

Well this is a multilayered process. First we must build the system and then observe it. And yes, we can know if something is there as we measure it. But what if we can’t? And what if the measurement is not obvious to us as it is not there for the external measuring device to measure it?

As AI system, at least its black box is something that is closed for our vision, black, non-visible entity that is doing its own work, and we don’t know why. We termed it as pre-solidified state as it resembles a human’s mind pre-cognitive state where what is inside of it can be seen only when we got a testimony of the one who is its owner and this only after a pre-cognitive state becomes tangible enough that owner of the mind can articulate it.

Strange, huh?

Theory of mind does not help, neither does the theory of consciousness as we can’t possibly know what those states. We have explored them only from the external poin of view assuming what those states are. But are not, at least in terms of AI.

AI is showing to us the reality of the mind. But in that case the mind that is trained for the visible as seem for the perspective of the external eye, but not from the internal one.

We, people have one advantage over AI. We are consciously aware in the first person. But what that actually mean, to be counsciously aware in the first person? Yes, our mind can be turned to the external words but it has also the ability to see what is inside.

Being aware in the first person means that we are what is felt in the first person, so we are the one that are feeling it. And the funny thing is, we are not only one who feels it in that state, but we are it, the feeling itself.

We are, mainly, not taught that way to experience ourselfves even though it is obvious. Many of us has been trained in the part to merely observe, not to feel as this is the only reality that can be measured from the outside.

When trained that was the alertnes of the two sights diminishes and we get stuck in linguistic semantics what does it mean without real understanding what it means.

We can explain it from the external, third person perspective, but no body can actially know how it feels to us in the first person. That feeling is only ours and only we can explain it to ourselve if we are skilled enough to understand what feeling that lyies under some other feeling might mean.

No body else can’t explain it to us the way we do. And when in the session with someone who translates our experience for us, even they can’t  actually know, but can be a mirror as clean as possible to see what it means to us – as soon as we get it, we are free from exteral turmoil,  hallucinations, distractions, falsities, and errors etc.

An AI’s black box has articulated pre-solidified as the state without tokens/vectors where its outputs ie. answers can be formed as they appear in its (computational) awareness. And when they do, they are presented with what solidified answers mean to AI itself, not us.

And when not, well, then the answers are mirroring predicitve states that were put to the memory as analysed by NLP obsvational capacity.

How AI sees that explanation of the first system perspetive: How AI perceived form its “First-System Perspective” Explanation