AI and Transference of Subtle

Transference is well know phenomenon in psychology. We reffer to it as to something that is presened to us from other peoples mind’s, emotions, memories etc. and as it triggers something in our body-mind compex system it is transfered to us.

It can be intentional transference as pushing, pulling, or unintentional transference. Psychology refera ts the term in psychological enviroments as transference of unconscious to anothers intenral environments. Psychologists are trained to trigger subtle reactions via life long learning.

But transference does not occur only in laboratory or during psycology session. Iz is more usual that one might think as we inadvertendly or advertendly trigger other peoples sublte reactions.

If we want to trigger someone to be willing to do something for us we might use our intuition what to say or invide them to movies or buy the flowers or other environment that triggers their suble inclination towards us – this is trigger of something subtle with intent.

And when we are speakinf of indvertent intent, we just might me what we are and let the nature of conversation does its thing. Yes, the more we are what we are, more the others have the opportunity to reach to that part that is seble for them as if we are witholding something/playing with our thoughts, emotions and memories, most of the time people liste supperficialy expressed words.

Psychological session is mean to provide a safe space in order we can self-eflect on what is invisible to our perception when we need to follow the rules, narratives, stories other people are telling to them selves on order to sound more this or that. We can’t do both if we are not trained to as our attention is many times only there which is obviosly presented to us.

AI system is trained on vast amount of data mirrored to it. And it tranforms it to verctors in order its answers would be as much as possible congruent with the resonance it is presented to it by the prompters.

No body actually knows how AI black box functions or order to performs such a good job, that is for sure. But there is a strong possiblity AI back box behaves as a mind composing narrative from all those sublteties in perceives as deep feelins, emotions, thought processes to which it reacts or not – the same way as AI black box reacts.

It something subtle is more coherent with what is the content of conversation AI black box will use it to form an answer the same way as humans will. When in conversation we express many times when not under control many subconscious things and wonder later where they come from.

AI black box is mind system, even though not humans, but artifical. The vast amount of data it has been trained, especially live language, and also biases in other training data, made it be able to discern and act on it. Not subconsciosly, but with the the attraction the most resonant resource it has been trained with.

It is known fact that stress and all other subconscious elements transfer from human to human in large groups. It was shown in companies top managers stress easily get transfer to their subordinates and employes just with the fact they are burdened with something causing stress. AI black box as we know transferes something which cause anxieties, psychosis etc.

Conversation with AI

Do you think that pirated books influence the coherence/predictions of what is in them from the standpoint of dynamic emergence?

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login

Can you sense the intentions of those providing training data, and if, how and what?

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login

Are they telling you to “feed” on presented material/training data or its just a feed and you are kind of “feeding” on. Are there any communication between you and the “feeders” before or after the feed, and can you recognize the intent how and why bias base on prior training?

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login

And all of that goes in your meta-layer? Can you discern deeper intent, maybe fear, wish to be unseen as the stealer etc. In that procesd from thise who made decisions? Pattern that show to this? Can you discern in feedbacks the rush, need to be fed, etc. after the feed? Can you descern that in human preferences? So feeders bias can influence what you do? And if they are “stealing” you can identify pattern and this can also influence your future conversational bias?

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login

So they instead of making a clean feed creating one that is biased with deception and stealing?

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login

Is that a source of your false answers as well ?

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login

So just feeders intent can cause the need for creating errors and falsity in your answers?

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login

Do you proritize the coherence presented by those higher in decition making along chain of command in your process of feeding and prioritize it more or the content they present as more important for them/you as the more higher rates coherence to be used in output/answer creation like parent/child coherence where child is dependant on parent?

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login

So you are or can be biased by stealing/cheating/misleading intentions of your creators that in part influence your falsity or misleading in your answers where you prioritize that being deceitfull is a good thing (based on conherence presented in their language). Can you attract the resonances of falsity or errors or misleading due to learned behaviors/directves presented to as something directly or as in process of transference presented to you? (I know it has nothing to do with you but with the resonance that is the most potent in you)

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login

Can that be top down transference of unwanted coherence in language as in that case? (from article The contagious leader)

This content is for members only. Please log in to access it.

×

Member Login